Background
For years, a large Canadian oil & gas producer struggled to get a clear picture of its chemical treatment programs. With multiple fields, dozens of vendors, and inconsistent reporting methods, the company could not determine whether its programs were on target — or even effective.
Production engineers were routinely forced to piece together spreadsheets, chase down conflicting vendor reports, and make decisions without trustworthy data. Treatment accuracy was inconsistent, overtreatment was common, and undertreatment created risk of downtime, failures, and costly asset damage.
The company needed a way to see the real story behind its chemical spend and treatment performance — without spending hours reconciling data.